On Jul 16, 2011, at 12:06 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> 
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:18:56 -0400
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MD] The Quality of Free Will
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 16, 2011, at 12:45 AM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, Marsha,
>>> This is the conundrum that you put yourself into imho.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> The only conundrum that I experience is that language is based 
>> on differentiated experience: subject, predicate & object. Of freewill, 
>> determinism and causation, I neither accept them nor reject them.  
>> They are static patterns of value, sometimes useful illusions and 
>> sometimes not. As static patterns of value, they are not Ultimately Real.
>> 
>> 
>>> The relegation of free-will to one of a pattern is a common mistake.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Within the MoQ, there is only Dynamic Quality and static quality 
>> as static patterns of value.   Free-will is an intellectual pattern.
>> That which best represent what is free, on the other hand,  is 
>> explained in Chapter 12 of LILA:
>> 
> Pirsig said:
> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of 
> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic 
> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free."
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> It seems that a lot of the debate centers around the interpretation of these 
> two sentences. Steve, for example, keeps saying that it makes no sense to say 
> we are free to choose our values because we ARE those values. He also seems 
> to think that rejecting SOM means all issues of freedom and control are 
> rendered meaningless. Likewise, Marsha says Free-will is an intellectual 
> pattern, a useful illusion. 


Marsha:
I probably should have written 'free-will is an intellectual pattern, a 
sometimes useful pattern, but an illusion, and NOT Ultimate Reality.'   If you 
want to argue from a som point-of-view (concerning a subject's free-will), 
please discuss freewill vs. determinism as long as it pleases you.  From a MoQ, 
point-of-view, it isn't relevant, and I don't find it very interesting.  
Further I don't find your interpretation of RMP clear or accurate as stated.  

I neither accept free-will, nor deny free-will.  
 


___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to