Dmb, Within MoQ self as a a collection of ever-changing, interrelated, impermanent, static patterns of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in a field of Dynamic Quality, there is NO locus of control and NO permanence.
Marsha > > dmb says: > Yep. That's what I'm talking about, right there. Why can't "the will" belong > to the MOQ's self? You keep saying it can only ever be a possession of the > Cartesian self but you never say why. Since the MOQ's self does have the > capacity to act freely, in what sense is this not a matter of one's will? The > "will" doesn't have to be a metaphysical concept at all. It is simply the > name for one's capacity to decide, to make a choice or initiate action. The > MOQ does not deny that capacity. It only denies that this is the capacity OF > the Cartesian. Instead, it is the capacity of the MOQ's self. This is really > so simple and obvious that I cannot believe anyone is disputing it. > > > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
