Hi Ham and All, DQ, indefinable levels in existence, evolution, makes sense to me, a base for a moral hierarchy.
Is evolution a meaningless word? Your use of the word "morality", on a site exploring the meaning of DQ/SQ indicates to me a decisive judgment for good or bad behavior without indicating the metaphysical basis for judgment beyond an acceptance in faith. Imho "Moral" value tied to evolution for value-sensibility is a judgment, beyond the Yes or No of SOM. DQ, indefinable, is the arbiter for sense or nonsense in an individual. SQ, defined, is the judgment. Joe On 8/17/11 12:56 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Yes, progress is being made even as we speak. As I've said before, morality > is a human precept, which means that value-sensibility is prerequisite for > moral judgment. This precept "doesn't quite fit" the MoQ paradigm which > posits Value (Quality) as a universal truth or principle. <snip> Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
