Hi Dan, Matt, Steve, et al ...

I see this is where the freedom / perception / will quote of Steve's arose.

I agree with Dan's point - have said it in my own ways many times -
it's possible to overthink, to too consciously overanalyze. We need to
switch our left-brains off and listen through the right more often.

Ian

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Steven Peterson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> dmb says:
>>>> I think Pirsig's comments only clarify and illuminate the very issue we've 
>>>> been debating for months and I think it is your questions that just muddle 
>>>> things...
>>
>>
>>> Dan:
>>> Yes, I agree with David here. Which is why I observed that sometimes
>>> we think too much. We don't see what is being said for thinking about
>>> what our answer is going to be...
>>
>> Steve:
>> Pirsig has described freedom as a matter of perception while every
>> other philosopher that I have ever read has described it as a matter
>> of will. You don't see that as interesting? That's not worth thinking
>> about?
>
> Dan:
>
> That's not what I mean... of course it's interesting and has
> intellectual value. Sometimes though, we gloss over what's important
> in life by over-thinking. Instead of listening to someone or really
> reading the words that they write, we are thinking of what our answer
> is goign to be. There is a time for thinking and a time for
> not-thinking. For example... I've talked before about how when I come
> upon a very difficult problem that I'll study it and think about it in
> great detail and then just let it go. Forget about it. And later,
> maybe a few hours or a few days or even a few weeks, an answer will
> just pop into my head, usually when I am doing something mindless like
> taking a walk. Did I think about the problem? Yes. And then I forgot
> it entirely. That is what I'm getting at when I say we sometimes think
> too much. We fail to allow time for not-thinking.
>
>>
>> What is so weird for me here is that based on what you've said
>> previously you _don't_ agree with dmb on this free will business.
>> Correct me if I am wrong, but I understood that you disagree with
>> dmb's claim that Pirsig's conception of freedom is about the capacity
>> of a rational agent to freely choose among a set of options.
>
> Dan:
>
> I am unsure that dmb and myself are in complete agreement in regards
> to the free will vs determinism debate but I don't exactly recall our
> disagreement at the moment. Did dmb say that a rational agent does the
> choosing? That sounds a lot like Ham. Still, just because we may not
> agree on one aspect of the MOQ doesn't mean we don't agree on most of
> it. I think we do.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dan
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to