Hi Ham and all, Existence is a fly in the ointment. The "emotional bridge" doesn't prove anything, it is not an argument. The acceptance of a truth in an 'emotional bridge' focuses the attention on reality that is indefinable yet knowable DQ/SQ. In that way the truth in the metaphysical base accepting evolution from the physical base has the validity for acceptability from a valid base in experience.
The dogma for logic in mathematics does not deny logic for metaphysics. 1/0 yields an indefinable, dynamic answer pointing to physics/metaphysics evolution. "The same page" reference refers to a conviction that reality is not beyond a rational explanation. But metaphysics is not physics. The logic of certainty in mathematics owes its strength to a false assumption that reality in existence is a numeric progression. Imho it is an evolutionary progression where man/woman like combine functions in producing a new individual. You, also, have a pleasant weekend! Joe On 9/2/11 11:56 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, your rhetoric eludes me. What, exactly, does your "emotional bridge" > prove? > > Your ideas are interesting, Joe, but we're far from from being on the same > page. > > Have a pleasant Labor Day weekend, > Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
