Evening, Marsha --

Will you explain to me what you mean by "conscious locus"?
Where did your idea of consciousness come from?  Why do you
believe it?   Maybe I've been all wrong in thinking the experience
of "direct awareness" has any relationship to what you are calling
"conscious locus."

I'll be happy to try, although to me this question is like asking: Please explain what you mean by "knowing".

I'm not sure, but I seem to recall that the significance of the word "locus" in the context of consciousness first struck me in a statement by Platt (remember him?) some years ago. Platt was not primarily interested in metaphysics, but he said something to the effect that "we are the locus of our reality," which is not only true but descriptive of the self. He referred me to Donald Hoffman, a cognitivc scientist who also happens to be a subjectivist. Subjectivism is the view that accords primacy to subjective experience as fundamental to all measure and law. Sometimes confused with Solipsism, it holds that the nature and existence of every object depends solely on someone's subjective awareness of it.

Since this may be a new concept to you, here's a précis of what Wikipedia has to say about it:

"Metaphysical subjectivism is the theory that reality is what we perceive to be real, and that there is no underlying true reality that exists independently of perception. One can also hold that it is consciousness rather than perception that is reality (subjective idealism). This is in contrast to metaphysical objectivism and philosophical realism, which assert that there is an underlying 'objective' reality which is perceived in different ways.

"This viewpoint should not be confused with the stance that 'all is illusion' or that 'there is no such thing as reality.' Metaphysical subjectivists hold that reality is real enough. They conceive, however, that the nature of reality as related to a given consciousness is dependent on that consciousness. This has its philosophical basis in the writings of Descartes (cogito ergo sum), and forms a cornerstone of Søren Kierkegaard's philosophy."

I included the following Donald Hoffman quote in my book (p.37), which should give you the general idea subjectivists are espousing:

"I believe that consciousness and its contents are all that exists. Space-time, matter and fields never were the fundamental denizens of the universe, but have always been, from the beginning, among the humbler contents of consciousness, dependent on it for their very being. The world of our daily experience - the world of tables, chairs, stars and people, with their attendant shapes, smells, feels and sounds - is a species-specific user interface to a realm far more complex, a realm whose essential character is conscious. ...If this be right, if consciousness is fundamental, then we should not be surprised that, despite centuries of effort by the most brilliant minds, there is as yet no physical theory of consciousness, no theory that explains how mindless matter and energy or fields could be, or cause, conscious experience." --[D.A. Hoffman, Visual Intelligence]

Now, I'm an Essentialist, not a subjectivist; but anyone in search of an alternative to S/O duality, in the Western tradition at least, would do well to consider this "philosophy of mind" before forming a metaphysical conclusion. Whatever "else exists" out there amounts to nothing unless there is subjective awareness of it. This is as true in Essentialism as it is in Qualityism or any other metaphysical ontology.

So to answer your question, Marsha, I would say that subjective awareness -- whether you call it consciousness, sensibility, or simply 'knowing' -- is primary to existential reality. And it only occurs in the individuated state of 'being-aware'. (I'm sure you will find corollaries of this concept in the doctrines of Eastern mysticism.)

Thanks for the query.  I hope I've satisfied your curiosity.

In support of the subjective Self,
Ham


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to