On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:17 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Steve said to dmb: > ..Anyway, are you suggesting here that Boyle's Two-Stage model for > understanding Jamesian free will, is what Pirsig means by freedom? ...It > [Doyle's lecture to the William James Society at Harvard] would perhaps have > helped you if the issue was that I didn't understand what Jamesian free will > was. But the issue for me is .... > > > > dmb says: > Dude, the issue is your understanding of Jamesian free will. You brought the > issue to the table when you starting quoting from James essay, "The Dilemma > of Determinism". And it was Marsha who found the Youtube lectures, although I > had earlier quoted Doyle in my efforts to explain how you were misreading > James's essay.
Marsha: My question was, in general: How does William James improve the MoQ? As far as I can see it does not. It just points backwards and has nothing to say about Quality, static patterns, or the hierarchical, evolutionary structure that helps evaluate many conflicting patterns. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
