Hello Matt,

On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Matt Kundert wrote:

> 
> Hello Margie,
> 
>> Hello Mark,  
>> 
>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Matt Kundert wrote:
>>> 
>>> Matt said:
>>> I'm wondering what it even means for science to reject, say, 
>>> biological values.
>>> 
>>> Marsha said:
>>> Science might reject the physical responses accompanying jealousy, 
>>> fear or hate from biasing the interpretation or presentation of data.
>>> 
>>> Matt also said:
>>> When did biology reject sex?
>>> 
>>> Marsha also said:
>>> Biology includes the study of sex.
>>> 
>>> Matt:
>>> The first response construes Pirsig in a useful way, but the second 
>>> walks into why the formulation is odd: science _studies_ stuff, but to 
>>> say it _includes_ it without the "study of" bit is to think that biology 
>>> includes having scientists having a lot of sex with each other ("in the 
>>> name of science," they keep telling their spouses).  The answer to 
>>> the rhetorical question doesn't rebut the premise in the right way in 
>>> order to clarify the issue.  Science rejects jealousy and fear as 
>>> appropriate responses in the "study of" bit, but in the same way the 
>>> answer to the second question could've been "biology includes the 
>>> study of fear."  Biology doesn't reject sex, and it doesn't reject fear, 
>>> in toto: rather it rejects fear and sex in terms of their relevance to 
>>> the "study of" stuff.  Which is why I find the Pirsig formulation a 
>>> little lop-sided.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Since there is no absolute by which to reckon whether RMP's 
>> formulation is a little lop-sided or your head is a little lop-sided, 
>> I'd have to wonder what are you trying to grasp?  Do you know?  
>> 
>> 
> Matt:
> Why on earth do we need an absolute to be able to make value 
> judgements?  Did I not relativize the judgement properly enough to 
> my self and its perspective?  Oh, I see that I did.
> 
> What on earth are you looking for, Margie?
> 

Marsha:
Make all the value judgements you deem necessary.  That doesn't mean 
I need to accept or reject them.  That was the meaning of my response.  
Didn't you get that?  Maybe you should have tried a more careful reading.  


Marsha



___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to