Hi Marsha, Whatever, at least I now understand your foundational premise. I can now read your posts with that understanding. Let me know if it changes...
Mark On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:31 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >>>> >>>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 9:29 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, 118 wrote: >>>>> , >>>>>>> Marsha: >>>>>>> Where did I say that ALL knowledge was intellectual in nature??? I >>>>>>> never made such a claim. You must be the one confused. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark: >>>>>> It was in the quotes you provided. Perhaps you want to reconsider? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marsha: >>>>> Provide the quotes!!! I have never stated that all knowledge was from >>>>> the intellectual level. >>>>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:13 AM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Mark: >>>> I may be mistaken, but those quotes you provide say many things. It was >>>> the one which broke a car up into a set of seats. Are you saying that >>>> that author was incorrect with his analogy? If so, you should qualify the >>>> quotes you provide, otherwise I have to assume they are speaking for you. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Marsha: >>> Provide my email with the quote!!! >>> >>> > >> Mark: >> You know exactly what I am referring to. >> >> But, now I know that when you speak of "knowledge" you are not referring to >> the intellectual variety. I am glad we cleared this up, your use of quotes >> can be misleading, and sometimes I do not understand what point you are >> trying to make since you provide no explanation. >> >> The James's quote refers to the conceptual variety. If you see this >> differently, let me know. And no, I do not have to remind you of what you >> posted by reading back to you your post. >> >> > > Hi Mark, > > Baloney! > > The quote is quite clear. The James quote states "all knowledge" NOT > "intellectual knowledge". Have you been taking Dave Buchanan lessons again? > > > “It was classic William James, imbued with a sense of the relativism of all > knowledge, a respect for and curiosity about alternative perspectives, an > instinct to analyze clearly and thoroughly but to develop a synthesis > wherever possible, and a conviction that the truth of any idea or thing is > best understood by observing its action in the world. > > > Marsha > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
