Hi Mark, My view on Quality is very simple. Reality = Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience). Would you like me to add that the fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality.
Marsha On Oct 28, 2011, at 11:30 AM, 118 wrote: > OK, Marsha. > Thank you for you reflexive writing, I learned a lot about your views on > Quality. > > Over and out. > > Mark > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:35 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mark, >> >> I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions, but thanks for more of >> your automatic writing.... >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:41 PM, 118 wrote: >> >>> Hi Marsha, >>> Wow, that is a mouthful, thanks for that. I guess it takes a static bundle >>> of words to present the static. >>> >>> If your ever changing is constant, then such a description never changes. >>> So in term of change, your static never changes, which I guess is why you >>> describe it as static. A few posts ago I asked you what this change is in >>> reference to. That is, your processes must change according to something >>> else. Otherwise your ever changing has no meaning. If I say I am moving >>> this must be in reference to something else. >>> >>> Does the static change with reference to the dynamic? This would be an >>> interesting idea to explore. I am looking for metaphors which can promote >>> the interaction between DQ and sq. any ideas? >>> >>> Since you seem to have read The Black Swan, you can appreciate that >>> -predictability only works in hindsight. So your static corresponds to >>> coyote John's notion of The Past, and DQ being the Future. This would mean >>> that we live between sq and DQ, or, in the present. What do you think? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:22 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Actually, Mark, here is my definition of static patterns of value: >>>> >>>> Static patterns of value are processes: ever-changing, conditionally >>>> co-dependent, impermanent and conceptualized. Ever-changing processes >>>> that pragmatically tend to persist and change within a stable, predictable >>>> pattern. These patterns are categorized into an evolutionary, >>>> hierarchical structure consisting of four discrete levels: inorganic, >>>> biological, social and intellectual. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Marsha >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:09 PM, MarshaV wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> I consider static patterns of value from two different points of view. >>>>> One would be the nature of ALL patterns: interdependent, impermanent, >>>>> ever-changing and conceptualized. A second would be by categorization >>>>> according to their evolutionary function: inorganic, biological, social >>>>> and intellectual. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Marsha >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> >>>> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>> Archives: >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
