On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:11 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:46 PM, 118 wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> Mark >> >> On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Marsha: >>> My view on Quality is very simple. Reality = Quality(unpatterned >>> experience/patterned experience). Would you like me to add that the >>> fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality. >>> >>> >> >> Mark: >> No, that would not work for me, as you know. >> >> If saying Quality is exactly the same as saying Reality, then I will have to >> give this word replacement a try. I will start with some simple >> metaphysical essays to see if it works. >> >> I guess that one of the questions that Pirsig received that started this >> "Are you teaching quality?" should be changed to "Are you teaching reality?" >> Who knows, maybe Quality does equal Reality. >> >> Maybe we should change the label for our interests to MoR-on your discovery >> of linguistic equivalence. I am game if every one else is. > > Marsha: > I don't think it needs to be changed to MoR for Reality anymore than it needs > to change to the MoV for Value, or the MoE for Experience, or the MoM for > Morals. > Marsha: Or, I could say that metaphysics is the investigation into the nature of Reality, so that I have found Reality to be Quality: Dynamic and static. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
