On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:46 PM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > Mark > > On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> My view on Quality is very simple. Reality = Quality(unpatterned >> experience/patterned experience). Would you like me to add that the >> fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> > No, that would not work for me, as you know. > > If saying Quality is exactly the same as saying Reality, then I will have to > give this word replacement a try. I will start with some simple metaphysical > essays to see if it works. > > I guess that one of the questions that Pirsig received that started this "Are > you teaching quality?" should be changed to "Are you teaching reality?" Who > knows, maybe Quality does equal Reality. > > Maybe we should change the label for our interests to MoR-on your discovery > of linguistic equivalence. I am game if every one else is.
Hi Mark, I don't think it needs to be changed to MoR for Reality anymore than it needs to the MoV for Value, or the MoE for Experience, or the MoM for Morals. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
