Hi Marsha, I understand. I guess I find discussing MoQ interesting so please forgive my constant questioning. Consider perhaps, that non-dualism is a concept and does not exist outside of that. It is yet another way of encapsulating a way we think. If something is difficult to discuss it means that the language has not been created, by whomever. It is nothing more profound than that. For communicating in complex ways is what we humans do. We should glorify in that rather that demean it or push it aside as some aberration.
Happy Holidays Sent laboriously from an iPhone, Mark On Dec 18, 2011, at 1:32 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mark, > > As I wrote yesterday, both Dynamic Quality and Sunyata, are nondualistic and, > therefore, difficult to discuss. And I am but a mere student of both the MoQ > and Buddhism. I use my own words when I think they might contribute > something; otherwise, I consider opinions, yours and mine, like little puffy > clouds in a big blue sky. ;-) If you want endless paraphrasing and fluff, > there are others more willing to provide you with what you want. Rather > than offer opinion, I would suggest a meditation practice. > > While I am a decent cook, when it comes to making cookies and tortes, I do > use a recipe. I have one outstanding recipe for a Raspberry Marzipan Torte. > December 22nd is Yule, the Winter Solstice, I will be making cookies today > for Thursday's celebration. > > Goddess bles you. > > > Marsha > > > > > On Dec 18, 2011, at 1:48 AM, 118 wrote: > >> Marsha, >> You can keep saying this is so, but without an explanation as to why, it >> seems like you are just walking around with a bullhorn. If somebody asks >> you what you are cooking do you run to look for a quote to answer? Don't >> you use your own words? That is all I am asking for. I am too far away to >> bite you. >> >> God bless you. >> >> Sent laboriously from an iPhone, >> Mark >> >> On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:50 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2011, at 11:54 AM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Marsha, how, specifically, does this relate to DQ, sq, and the levels of >>>> MoQ? >>> >>> Marsha: >>> It is my opinion that Quality, or DQ, corresponds to Buddhism's Sunyata, or >>> Emptiness, and that relationship has been established in Anthony's PhD and >>> the MoQ Textbook: >>> >>> "The Dynamic Quality viewpoint of the MOQ corresponds to the notion of >>> sunyata or nothingness as understood by Nagarjuna (a Mahayana Buddhist >>> philosopher) while the static quality viewpoint (sammuti-sacca) of the MOQ >>> corresponds to sunyavada (i.e. the conditioned component or world of maya)." >>> (McWatt, Anthony, 'A Critical Analysis of Robert Pirsig’s Metaphysics of >>> Quality') >>> >>> So I find it worth considering what the Buddhist's have to say about >>> Emptiness, and what this particular presentation says about the importance >>> of realizing Emptiness, or Dynamic Quality. I find it a very thoughtful >>> presentation. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:42 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Marsha, >>>> Was it thoughtful in terms of your understanding of MoQ, or was it not >>>> related to MoQ? What did you think about? That is, since it was >>>> thoughtful, what thoughts did it produce? Or, is that a secret? >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Andre, >>>>> >>>>> I found the presentation on Emptiness very thoughtful. For what it's >>>>> worth. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marsha >>>>> > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
