Tuukka,

Unfortunately, I do not understand what you are presenting.  I do not have a 
familiarity with the terms as you are using them.  I understand we all might 
find different aspects of the MoQ important, and may approach that interest 
from different points-of-view.  Broadly, I tend to want to consider a pattern 
from a position of its opposite.  That allows for the widest range of 
possibilities for individual instances and the most dynamic point-of-view.  But 
that's just my opinion.  Bottomline, for me, is that Reality = 
Experience(patterned experience/unpatterned experience).   I think to 
categorize patterns into the four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical structure:  
inorganic, biological, social and intellectual is brilliant, rational, modern, 
and suggests a way to bridge Western science with Eastern wisdom.  But this is 
only my own perspective.  

But that's enough of me repeating my point-of-view once again, to the point of 
ad nauseam some would say.  Hopefully as you continue to present your 
point-of-view it wll become bstter understood.  


Marsha





Sent from my iPad

On Dec 22, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Tuukka Virtaperko <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Marsha,
> 
> I agree. I'd say Pirsig's patterns are descriptive abstractions of 
> conventional-habitual experience.
> 
> I also think that conventional-habitual experience is the same as romantic 
> quality.
> 
> But because Pirsig's patterns are an analogy of conventional-habitual 
> experience, I think they do not include normative things such as formal logic 
> and axiomatic mathematics. To be sure, such formal constructs may be derived 
> from Pirsig's patterns, but once that has been done, they are inherently 
> independent of experience.
> 
> In other words, I believe it's possible to construct a normative set of 
> patterns which is an analogy of Pirsig's patterns, but not the same thing.
> 
> 1. The fundamental normative pattern is the /existence pattern/. It
> contains all existing entities, such as symbols and their basic
> relations.
> 2.  From the existence pattern emerges the /increment pattern/. This
> pattern includes all existing structures that can have duplicates or
> iterations. It contains variables and coefficients.
> 3.  From the increment pattern emerges the /interaction pattern/. That
> pattern includes all rules regarding what kind of increments are
> possible and what are not. It contains functions and topology.
> 4.  From the interaction pattern emerges the /control pattern/, which
> contains rules on what can be stated of interactions and what can
> not be stated. It contains things like axiomatization and completeness.
> 
> 
> -Tuukka
> 
> 
> 
> 22.12.2011 13:29, MarshaV kirjoitti:
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> I see patterns, of which words and definitions are an aspect, to all be 
>> analogy for conventional-habitual experience.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:40 PM, 118<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> OK I see how you are using analogy.  I would use the word symbolism.  
>>> There, there was no complaint there, I must be improving my attitude.  
>>> Thanks for pointing it out.
>>> 
>>> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:05 PM, MarshaV<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:19 AM, 118<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>>> I am not griping, I am just talking.  Settle down, I am not out to get
>>>>> you.  My only point was that non-duality is a word which we give the
>>>>> idea that there is no "other".
>>>> And I don't think you're out to get me, you just tend towards complaint.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> An analogy is when we represent something with a similar thing.
>>>>> Something that is hard to describe is presented as something that is
>>>>> similar.
>>>> 
>>>> I used 'nonduality' as similar to a type of experience.  But explanation, 
>>>> too, with its use of signs and symbols (words) is the use of analogies all 
>>>> the way down.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to