Mark,
See my response to Ham. Beyond that, your questions do not make sense to me,
so I don't know.
Marsha
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:19 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Marsha,
> Yes, I am aware that such is the way you see. But, what is your
> point? How does your vision help explain and further characterize the
> Metaphysics of Quality? If you truly see that what you present is an
> analogy, then what lies below the analogy (besides another analogy).
> I could say the world is cheese (as an analogy), and if asked, I could
> say that the analogy I present is simply an analogy which is made up
> of analogies. Would this explain what I mean? For what reason do you
> like to use the concept of "patterns"?
>
> How is it that your presentation of all as analogy on analogy work in
> favor of MoQ? I don't care if people of importance have said the
> same. Feel free to present any quote from Pirsig to answer this.
> Also, if you could, please present your interpretation of such quote,
> in that way I can understand why your specifically provide it.
> Perhaps it is not your intention to support your belief system on MoQ
> discuss; I have no opinion on that either negative or positive. If
> you choose not to answer these questions, I can respect that.
>
> There you go, questions without criticism. I cannot find anything to
> criticize in what you present.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:29 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I see patterns, of which words and definitions are an aspect, to all be
>> analogy for conventional-habitual experience.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
