Hi Mark, >> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective? > > In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written > about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and > is wandering the city. An alternative to that could be "best" for the > Western perspective. Thus MoQ.
So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective? >> So sq is there just to point to DQ? > > That is one of the things that it does. It also helps us start our > cars in the morning, and choose food from a menu. Yes... that's about > it, just those three things unless you can think of some others... Not really... >> >> So we just need to have a goal of DQ and not sq? So if I just have a goal of >> DQ, then I need not worry about the patterns I am creating? > > Not a goal of DQ, a goal of understanding. Why do you wish to learn > more about MoQ by participating in this forum? This is a serious > question, I just want to understand. Yes, to understand and in the process make myself a better person. -David. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
