David, What is this 20 questions? I have no problem answering, but do you have any opinions of your own.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > >>> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective? >> >> In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written >> about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and >> is wandering the city. An alternative to that could be "best" for the >> Western perspective. Thus MoQ. > > So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective? There is plenty good we are speaking of betterness within MoQ. > >>> So sq is there just to point to DQ? >> >> That is one of the things that it does. It also helps us start our >> cars in the morning, and choose food from a menu. Yes... that's about >> it, just those three things unless you can think of some others... > > Not really... Then that is the sum total. > >>> >>> So we just need to have a goal of DQ and not sq? So if I just have a goal of >>> DQ, then I need not worry about the patterns I am creating? >> >> Not a goal of DQ, a goal of understanding. Why do you wish to learn >> more about MoQ by participating in this forum? This is a serious >> question, I just want to understand. > > Yes, to understand and in the process make myself a better person. My goal too. How's it working out for you? Any insights you wish to share? Mark > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
