Hi dmb, > > david harding said: > .., the MOQ is intellectual mysticism and it is completely aware of the > contradiction in terms when it claims as such. This is where the MOQ differs > from mysticism. It fully acknowledges the degenerativism yet intellectual > value in ruining the undefined source of all things by claiming as such. > > > dmb says: > The MOQ is a big coherent set of intellectual static patterns, a system of > words, concepts and definitions. But Quality itself is left undefined. It is > the central point around which all these patterns revolve, but this mystic > reality is only referred to or pointed at. But there is nothing degenerate > about defining those definable words or conceptualizing the MOQ's concepts. > In fact, when discussing metaphysics, failing to define the terms and > properly conceptualize the concepts would be degenerate or, at best, > incompetent.
Thats right. A metaphysics is mystically degenerate yet intellectually very valuable. -David. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
