On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:47 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > This is an example of how our assumptions tumble out of us, beckoned or not. > We enter into a situation, assess it from our own personal worldview, and > generously offer suggestions for improvement that were never invited in the > first place. In The Fifth Discipline, Peter Senge writes: “Mental models are > deeply ingrained assumptions that influence how we understand the world and > how we take action. We do not “have” mental models. We “are” our mental > models…The discipline of working with mental models starts with turning the > mirror inward; learning to unearth our internal pictures of the world, to > bring them to the surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny.” (Phillips, > Jan, 'The Art of Original Thinking – The Making of a Thought Leader') > > Marsha: > I see "mental models" very close to "static patterns of value". The last > sentence in the above also sets forward a working solution. > > > dmb says: > The last sentence is the solution?
I said 'a working solution' not 'the working solution'. Cannot you not read? This is a demonstration of your either/or mentality. Basically, I have little respect for your intellect and your explanations. Before you defend something you should learn to present and explain it. The best you can do is utter nonsensical indignations like "gumption-sucking bullshit" "I hate it", "bogus", "bizarre", "right-wing ignoramus". I find very little that you write the least bit interesting. And I won't defend myself against you misconceptions, projections and insults; that would be wasting my time and energy. If people want to accept your twisted accusations, let them. Why don't you amuse everyone and offer your definition of 'truth'? I need a laugh. Thanks, Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
