Hi Ron, If I might offer my personal opinion. I have respect for static (patterned) value; static patterned value is my life. But, for me, holding patterns as hypothetical is honoring, above all, their fundamental DQ nature. It's not merely a theoretical opinion.
Marsha On Sep 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mark had said] > OK, lets say that Truth as discussed from the Quality perspective, an Quality > as discussed from the Truth perspective are the same thing, as you state. > How about if we discuss Quality? Are you game for this. This is, after all, > MOQ. > > How would you present Quality to open the discussion, I have tried many > times. Don't give us this undefinable nonsense for the same can be said of > Truth. Let us discuss a metaphysics based on Quality. What does this mean > to you? > > [Ron replies] > Thats right Mark, it points to discussions regarding the subject matter of > Dynamic Quality. Definitions, descriptions and explanations > are provisional, they must be open to revision because the test of any > definition, description and explanation is the Dynamic flow of > experience. Now, to say all definition, description and explanation is > "hypothetical" is to only look at one side of the coin so to speak, > It ignores this provisional nature and the test of it's value, in fact it > ignores the very nature of value itself. > > A metaphysics based on Quality is the development of meaning in experience it > is the perpetual inquirey of what are the best things > in life. > > > .. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
