Jan Anders I started with a question for you and that was whether there is such as thing a “low dynamic quality”. But from the answers you have given, you seem rather confused about what dynamic quality is and its distinction from all else that you refer to as the same.
JAA: You have snipped out the most important part of my answer, the qoute from Lila, I'll just give you this little advice: JAA: Notice the last little letter, it's an s. This little letter is what it is all about It means that there are not one Single moral but many. Dynamic quality, value, evolutionary Ethics, experience or whatever we might call it is different, all the time. Khoo; Sorry to say this but you are hardly in a position to give any advice about DQ if you are not clear in your head what it is. Quoting chapter and verse from Lila as you have done does not mean you understand DQ. I will go further: intellectualism based on vicarious experience will not lead to an understanding of DQ. You have to experience it yourself. If you did, you would not attempt to conclude that “RMP is here using quality, moral and ethics alternately for Dynamic Quality”. If you did, you would know it does not work that way If you did, you would not mistake our responses to DQ for DQ itself which you would find in your very own precious quote” “this beginning response to Dynamic Quality - is an elementary unit of ethics upon which all right and wrong can be based.” JAA: Quality starts a fire in the mountains of Colorado because inorganically it is better no matter what the biological or social values would prefer, This is how the "natural forces" can come loose and cause massive destruction. We call this "low dynamic quality" because it destroys patterns at higher levels. Khoo: So you maintain you assertion that “low dynamic quality” destroys patterns at higher levels. I had no idea Quality had pyrogenic qualities but if you can’t see past the lows and the highs of your responses to dynamic quality, you have not seen dynamic quality at all. At the explicate level, the universe constantly destroys and creates. Attach if you will a value to it as your response. At the implicate level, there is only the Dynamic Quality of Lila and the Quality of ZAMM beyond your characterization and beyond your response. JAA There are hundreds of examples of a person on a motorcycle. It is obvious that many of them think that this is a toy because of undeveloped social and intellectual moral and then they "drive to Hell", this is just another example of "low dynamic quality", the driver will have a "bad" experience...don't you think? The spectator might laugh but it is bad driving, bad motorcycle maintenance terns at higher levels. Khoo: As my final word on this subject, it would seem you are so deeply embedded in the social matrix of the levels you espouse. So much so you would haughtily dismiss those with “undeveloped social and intellectual moral(s) ?” as “low dynamic quality”. If your views are so hierarchically rigid, how can you see the good in the bad when all you see is the bad? How can you see DQ at all? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
