Jan Anders I snip out for brevity and for relevance. In spite of that I have maintained most of your quotes which have yet to answer me my original question to you; is there such a thing as " low dynanic quality".
You have come into this conversation with your structure of values. But is that structure Dynamic Quality ? Sent by DiGi from my BlackBerry® Smartphone -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sender: [email protected]: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:12:56 Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Quality forklift performance [email protected]> From: Jan-Anders Andersson <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B146) In-Reply-To: <caboneoo52-rxjy4narwbq5khnbbyq2uj+hrjdyz-hzao+uu...@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:12:52 +0100 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Khoo Hock Aun I notice that you keep on snipping out the most important parts. This makes m= e very curious. What do you think about experience? Are there something called betterness or= are all values the same?= Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
