http://www.andrewmbailey.com/pvi/IndetVague.pdf
for marsha ,very strong article on the semantic vagueness of indeteminancy the author is not a bullshitter. If you read it correctly , Marsha,you will be able to see that Mr Buchanan wrote a very correct article Adrie 2013/4/7 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > Hi x-man, > > On Apr 7, 2013, at 10:36 AM, X Acto wrote: > > > Marsha: > > How about "It's all a ghost,...". Isn't the law of non-contradiciton > one of the laws of logic? "Ghosts and more ghosts." > > > > Ron: > > What gives those ghosts meaning is their neccessity in the immediate now > of experience. The law of non-contradiction > > is the first rule of meaning, you re either more prone to act apon it > or less. > > > > > > If all of reality is simply a ghost of the human imagination, how does > the explanation account for the wherefore of human > > imagination? > > The human imagination is the response of an organism to its environment, > but what do we mean by "organism" and > > "environment" or should we be looking at the word between them, > "reponse" . > > > > A ghost could only be a response to dynamic quality, lets go a bit > further and say it is a response OF dynamic quality. > > > > Well that renders those ghosts has having something of the nature of > dynamic quality, and if anything should be > > gained by the position "static quality is dynamic quality" is that those > ghosts are about as real as the term"real" can mean, > > no? > > Marsha: > If RMP can say that it's all ghosts and human imagination and also state > that Isaac Newton is a very good ghost, than I can say static patterns are > all illusion and also state that they are conventionally meaningful. > > There are examples where the law of non-contradiction does not hold, you > might reconsider if it should be called the first rule of meaning. I > wouldn't consider it the first rule of meaning. And even to the saying > that things have to agree with common sense, we can call up Einstein's > "Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." > When David Harding asked me if the patterns of the Intellectual Level > matter, I answered "Yes." I believe they do matter. So yes, those ghosts > (illusions) are about as conventionally real as "real" can mean. Of course > that's if you NEED the kind of certainty a word like "real" suggests. > > > Marsha > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
