Hi Joe,
You're one your own. I am not sure what you are talking about. Marsha On Apr 7, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marsha V and All, > > SOM's theory of how we know things was through abstraction of the essence > from reality by the mind, giving it intentional existence in the mind using > a definable word form from a template of previous experience. > > MOQ, Pirsig suggests knowledge is the direct experience of reality DQ/SQ. > Dreams can follow that experiential reality, creating analogues mocking > reality? > > How can I know indefinable DQ? For me consciousness seems to be the only > reality that identifies a capability of an indefinable direct experience of > DQ. Dreams are interesting and creative mocking consciousness. They seem > so real. Nightmares! > > Joe > > > On 4/6/13 9:50 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What do you mean by 'direct perception'? To the question "What is that?", >> the mind may adjust the visual data, but not apply language? Or do you have >> a >> different explanation? > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
