Hi dmb,

Marsha:
I was addressing Dynamic Quality as indivisible, undefinable and unknowable: 
inderterminate.  I was not addressing the philosophical problems associated 
determinism/indeterminism.  And I clearly stated that I was using the standard 
dictionary definition.

in·de·ter·mi·nate  
adjective
1.  not determinate; not precisely fixed in extent; indefinite;uncertain.
2.  not clear; vague.
3.  not established.
4.  not settled or decided.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/indeterminate?s=t 

Marsha now: 
Let's take a look at indeterminate from the 'not determinate' aspect:

de·ter·mi·nate 
adjective
1.  [not] having defined limits; [not] definite.
2.  [not] settled; [not] positive.
3.  [not] conclusive; [not] final.
4.  [not] resolute.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/determinate?s=t 

Marsha:
I think the definition works well.  As for you I have no interest in addressing 
your projections, misrepresentations, sarcasm, irony, parody and insults are 
not interesting to me.  

I remember you writing that you owned a 4-volume set of books entitled 
'Encyclopedia of Philosophy'.  Thin ink on thin paper...  Jargon and 
philosophology do not make you and your posts more valuable; not to me.  
 
 
Marsha
 
 
 
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to