Hi Marsha,

"It's analogy all the way down and all the way out, and not a problem if we 
cannot always understand each other."

What do you mean by saying that its not a problem if we cannot understand each 
other?

On 09/04/2013, at 7:08 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> It's analogy all the way down and all the way out, and not a problem if we 
> cannot always understand each other.  I hope you _understand_ that I use the 
> term 'indeterminate' because "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and 
> unknowable" and my explanation had no relationship to the philosophical 
> determinacy/indeterminacy problem, in spite of the noisy straw dog.
> 
> Where to put sensations is interesting and sometimes a fun place to play, 
> though I don't believe it to be dependent on what is workable and useful in 
> explanation.  Schopenhauer had some good thoughts on the subject. I remember 
> presenting some A.S. posts on perceiving apples.  
> 
> And I certainly find it hard to believe you mind being obscure.  What to do 
> with consciousness is also interesting and deserving a good story.  I don't 
> believe the intellectual (static) MoQ is suppose to represent the Absolute 
> Truth:
> 
> "Strictly speaking, the creation of any metaphysics is an immoral act since 
> it's a lower form of evolution, intellect, trying to devour a higher mystic 
> one. The same thing that's wrong with philosophology when it tries to control 
> and devour philosophy is wrong with metaphysics when it tries to devour the 
> world intellectually. It attempts to capture the Dynamic within a static 
> pattern. But it never does. You never get it right. So why try? 
> 
> "It's like trying to construct a perfect unassailable chess game. No matter 
> how smart you are you're never going to play a game that is 'right' for all 
> people at all times, everywhere. Answers to ten questions led to a hundred 
> more and answers to those led to a thousand more. Not only would he never get 
> it right; the longer he worked on it the wronger it would probably get."
> 
> (RMP, 'LILA', Chapter 32)
> 
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> I sense no urgency in trying to come to grips with metaphysics.  MOQ tweaks
> the logic of SOM!  I am not convinced that I have a proper conception of
> logic.  An open forum seems to be the most rewarding test for logic.  I am
> sorry I am so obscure.  Good luck to you!
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 4/7/13 4:21 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Joe,
>> 
>> You're on your own.  I am not sure what you are talking about.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha V and All,
>>> 
>>> SOM's theory of how we know things was through abstraction of the essence
>>> from reality by the mind, giving it intentional existence in the mind using
>>> a definable word form from a template of previous experience.
>>> 
>>> MOQ, Pirsig suggests knowledge is the direct experience of reality  DQ/SQ.
>>> Dreams can follow that experiential reality, creating analogues mocking
>>> reality?
>>> 
>>> How can I know indefinable DQ?  For me consciousness seems to be the only
>>> reality that identifies a capability of an indefinable direct experience of
>>> DQ.  Dreams are interesting and creative mocking consciousness.  They seem
>>> so real.  Nightmares!
>>> 
>>> Joe 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/6/13 9:50 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What do you mean by 'direct perception'?   To the question "What is that?",
>>>> the mind may adjust the visual data, but not apply language?  Or do you 
>>>> have
>>>> a
>>>> different explanation?
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to