And so I conclude - Marsha is a mystic and has no interest in intellectual quality or questions about whether something exists before we think about it.
On 23/05/2013, at 8:11 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 23, 2013, at 5:43 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Marsha wrote: >>> You don't think so? >>> >>> Marsha wrote more: >>> >>> Imagination? How did you come to choose this particular entry from the >>> dictionary? How did you know this is what I meant? Maybe I meant >>> 'imagination' as a stand-in for 'illusion', 'ghost', 'useful fiction' and >>> 'maya'. >>> >>> Dictionary: >>> >>> Dictionary - "a book, optical disc, mobile device, or online lexical >>> resource(such as Dictionary.com ) containing a selection of the words of a >>> language, giving information about their meanings, pronunciations, >>> etymologies, inflected forms, derived forms, etc., expressed in either the >>> same or another language; lexicon; glossary. Print dictionaries of various >>> sizes, ranging from small pocket dictionaries to multivolume books, usually >>> sort entries alphabetically, as do typical CD or DVD dictionary >>> applications, allowing one to browse through the terms in sequence. All >>> electronic dictionaries, whether online or installed on a device, can >>> provide immediate, direct access to a search term, its meanings, and >>> ancillary information: _an unabridged dictionary of English; a >>> Japanese-English dictionary_." >>> >>> And more: >>> Is this what you think? You think of value sometimes as external >>> "objects"? That's interesting. >>> >>> And finally some more: >>> I can't imagine such a question. I accept the MoQ's fundamental principal >>> that the world is nothing but Value. >> >> >> Marsha, >> >> You seem only interested in playing the game of 'intellectual tries and >> fails to catch the mystic'. Oh, oh - I'll play the intellectual - you play >> the Mystic! >> >> And go! >> >> Orrrr.. not so much. dmb might like to play this game but I don't. Are you >> interested in the question of whether things exist before we think about >> them? > > David, > > Who's playing games now? Do you expect to manipulate me with such rhetoric? > Your question doesn't make sense to me. > Everything-is-connected-to-everything... Play the part of an intellectual if > it makes you feel superior. I'll play the role of a flow of ever-changing, > conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns: inorganic > patterns, biological patterns, social patterns and intellectual patterns of > value flowing within the infinite field of Dynamic Quality. > > Bye David. > > > Marsha > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
