[Paul said to Marsha] I feel like if we were in a room you would hit me with a stick to "snap me out of it!" ..Are you genuinely interested in my answer, though, or just setting me up for a trap? .. I'm sure you are, I'm just trying to get a feel for how to talk to you without getting hit by a stick.
[djh] It's not possible Paul. Marsha plays the game of the 'Mystic and the truth seeking intellectual idiots.' I'm all for this game when played correctly. It's too bad that a mysticism of the variety which doesn't value the static nature of intellectual patterns ruins both the mystic reality and intellectual quality. Apparently, according to this mystic variety - because the fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality it's a good idea to blur the static distinctions between concepts and non concepts such as sq and DQ respectively to be more in line with the flow of ever changing static patterns. It's all interconnected! Get groovy man! Talking intellectually with said folks can be very difficult. At any point in time they can say that the staticness of static patterns doesn't matter because it's all a projection anyway.. "Static patterns are projection, projection projection..." And they can complain at any time that you're also guilty of projection: "I do not 'like' that you project what you think I like and don't like." But as we know there's another 'context' which says that static patterns aren't projection or transient and actually exist 'out there'. Good luck showing Marsha this. Heaven knows many have tried - but the game she plays continues. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
