Greetings Paul,

On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Paul Turner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Marsha:
>> There are times when an email forum seems totally inadequate.  I sense
>> deep caring and I naturally want to respond.  I have not challenged your
>> thesis, but admire your motive and effort.
>> 
>> What dispute would you like to help resolve?  Can you first set up the
>> problem, as you interpret it?
> 
> Well what I saw was a lot of debate about whether static patterns are
> purely intellectual, whether everything is just an analogy, whether ideas
> come before matter or vice versa, etc.  The problem I see is that this
> ignores, in my opinion, the basic point made by the MOQ that reality is
> just what is valued, "reality" is itself subordinated to value.

You wrote: "... reality is just what is valued, "reality" is itself 
subordinated to value."   That "is" is a tricky word.  But of course,,, I 
accept the MoQ's central idea that the world is nothing but value


> When you
> start from that it is no longer necessary to say, for example, that static
> patterns are really just this or that, whether inorganic patterns really
> existed before humans.  

Yes, I agree it is no longer necessary. 


> By recognising two contexts or perspectives we can
> value both sides of the debate as and when appropriate without claiming
> either is ULTIMATELY better or more true than the other.  

Yes, I agree we can value both perspectives.   


> This hopefully
> shifts the focus onto how the MOQ can be successfully applied to other
> areas of inquiry and interest by selecting the best context for the
> specific purpose, rather than arguing one against the other.
> 
> Now it may be possible to formulate a single context which covers the value
> of both but I haven't seen it.

For explanation purposes, I agree that a two-context view can be extremely 
useful.


Marsha 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to