Ron said:
> Seeing how this topic of conversation gets derailed and hijacked
> by the 180 degree point of view, I would like to ask what form or function
> within the context of mythos reconstruction would serve best in the radically
> empirical method of falsifying truth theories or to be more precise finding
> which
> theories are better than others. Do either of you see dialectic playing a
> role in
> this process of inquirey?
> Also I think what has to be kept in mind when people connect correspondence
> theory
> with pragmatic truth is that a pragmatist does not seek an ideas agreement
> with
> experience so much as a discerning which ideas have the most meaning in the
> flow
> of said experience. Those with the most meaning being said to "agree".
>
> I wonder if you also would agree.
>
> I believe if an agreement can be arrived at in this context we can continue
> the reconstruction
> with greater clarity, or at the very least advance the discussion on this
> topic which does not
> get nearly enough attention.
dmb says:
I don't understand these questions.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
