Ron said to DMB, June 18th 2013: Seeing how this topic of conversation gets derailed and hijacked by the 180 degree point of view, I would like to ask what form or function within the context of mythos reconstruction would serve best in the radically empirical method of falsifying truth theories or to be more precise finding which theories are better than others. Do either of you see dialectic playing a role in this process of inquirey [sic]?
Also I think what has to be kept in mind when people connect correspondence theory with pragmatic truth is that a pragmatist does not seek an ideas agreement with experience so much as a discerning which ideas have the most meaning in the flow of said experience. Those with the most meaning being said to "agree". I wonder if you also would agree. I believe if an agreement can be arrived at in this context we can continue the reconstruction with greater clarity, or at the very least advance the discussion on this topic which does not get nearly enough attention... Dave Buchanan wondered June 19th: I don't understand these questions. Ant McWatt comments: I'm not surprized Dave. Neither do I!!! Ron, is there any chance of you rephrasing your questions here? Anthony . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
