From LILA: "Their overall subject he called a 'Metaphysics of Quality,' or sometimes a 'Metaphysics of Value,' or sometimes just 'MOQ' to save time."
"And Phaedrus knew something about values. Before he had gone up into the mountains he had written a whole book on values. Quality. Quality was value." Marsha: Just for the record, RMP uses the terms 'quality' and 'value' interchangeably. On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:02 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > dmb, 1. I accept the MoQ's idea that the world is nothing but value. "The Metaphysics of Quality's central idea that the world is nothing but value is not part of any philosophic tradition that I know of." - RMP Marsha: There is nothing wrong with the wording of my statement. ------------- Thanks, I will reword this statement such: 2. Value judgements, like *right or wrong* and *better or worse* do not apply to Dynamic Quality. "... my statement that Dynamic Quality is always affirmative was not a wise statement, since it constitutes a limitation or partial definition of Dynamic Quality. Whenever one talks about Dynamic Quality someone else can take whatever is said and make a static pattern out of it and then dialectically oppose that pattern. The best answer to the question, “What is Dynamic Quality?” is the ancient Vedic one——“Not this, not that.”" - RMP Not this, not that!!! Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
