Ron,

You "improve the human situation" not with WHY's and HOW's but with maintaining 
a good and open heart. (Remember: head, hand & *heart*)  Imho.   -   Betterness 
is relative.  Some types of conventional betterness might be based on how well 
an experience agrees with ones most cherished assumptions (patterns).  Or it 
might be based on a deeper insight that transcends all assumptions (patterns).  
For most of us, we volley between the two to different degrees.  The Western 
mythos is structured on a subject/object foundation.  It takes more than 
reading explanations to uproot these culturally dominated perceptions.  That is 
why I suggest meditation/mindfulness; not as a mountaintop activity, but as a 
daily practices.  There's insights to be gained, actual first-hand 
*experience*, that transcends explanation, and that's important for an 
empirically based metaphysics.  (Please note that I didn't suggest replacing 
reading and explanation with meditation.).  I do not think this point-o
 f-view negates preference and evolution.  


Marsha


On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> Sorry there seems to be too many hidden assumptions left out of your post for 
> me to make sense of it.  The only thing I might offer to negate the charge of 
> nihilism is that static quality is not annihilated.  Static quality is 
> conventionally real.
> 
> 
> [Ron]
> But it neglects the explanation of WHY and HOW static quality exists, 
> conventionally or otherwise.
> RMP is definitly trying to account for and explain the hanging together of 
> experience and DQ as "betterness"
> explains movement and why experience changes. "not this-not that" seems to 
> fail in this regard.
> 
> I therefore suspect that "not this-not that" is contextual towards 
> dialectical opposition in arguementation and to
> swap it out for betterness in "Lila" nullifies half the book, everything he 
> says about preference and evolution
> is just thrown out.
> 
> Perhaps you can explain how "not this-not that" fits together to explain 
> beauty and attraction and why some
> things are better than others. Because I can't seem to see how that works.
> 
> thnx
> 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to