John asked:
...I associate the romantic with art.  Is that wrong?

Arlo answered:
Again, depends on if you're in the problem space or the solution space. In ZMM, 
the "romantic" was associated with "art" because "art" was artificially 
divorced from reason. So, yes, within the problem space of ZMM, the romantic 
perspective was associated with aesthetics and beauty and painting and music.
In the solution space, however, this is very wrong. "Art" is "high-quality 
endeavor", and applies equally to the former distinctions of romantic and 
classic. In this post-ZMM space, it'd be more accurate to 'associate' art with 
Quality. "High-quality" and "artistic" become synonyms.In this space, 'art' is 
as much a part of reason as it is painting. Indeed, the distinction between 
'classic' and 'romantic' is broken down entirely. 'Writing a novel', 'repairing 
a motorcycle', 'building a rotisserie', 'painting a watercolor', 'performing a 
symphony', 'constructing a metaphysics', 'dancing around a maypole', 'doing 
differential calculus', ALL of these are 'art'.


John replied:
...I'd rather speak in terms of classic and romantic (the problem space) 
because that's where the one's I talk to dwell.



dmb says:
Since you were "talking" where the MOQers dwell and not on the street, John, 
your preference for the problem space makes no sense at all. I think the 
problem space is more comfortable for you because it props up your 
anti-intellectualism, which was dripping from most every sentence throughout 
that long post. By the same token and for the same reasons, you prefer to keep 
talk of the intellect out the the solution space because that's where we get a 
rationality expanded at its roots, where we get the art of rationality, the 
moral codes that put social values under intellectual values. And of course 
that solution space IS the MOQ rather than its metaphysical enemy, namely SOM 
with its artless attitudes of objectivity. As I often often put it when Marsha 
was repeatedly committing this epic mistake, you are talking about the disease 
instead of the cure. Hard to say whether anti-intellectualism is the cause or 
the effect of this mistake but they go hand in hand either way. 

Seems that you're not really a MOQer so much as a mocker, which wouldn't be so 
bad if you could really see what you were mocking. 


                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to