Talk about missing the point. Pity I started this thread. Dozens of posts in, hard to know how to bring it back to the point. First reply from Arlo did miss my point, but sincerely, so dialogue was possible. Second reply from Dave, produced of smokescreen quotes cut and paste from elsewhere, and started the usual obligatory ad-hominem attacks. Disgusting behaviour. Third from Ron, provided Dave with a second opportunity for an ant-religious smokescreen out of nowhere to trample the thread into the ground, with unrelated bollox. And MD is off and running - missing the point.
So starting where I started. Post-intellectual. Not non-intellectual or anti-intellectual, but the idea of intellectual but more so, more evolved, more progressive kind of intellectual. (Forget any previous coining of post-intelletual-ism, I'd like to avoid the errors of history, not re-inforce them.) How about it. An intellect informed by pre-intelletual radical-empiraical Pirsigian-quality is surely "better" than one that is not. Like GOF intellect, only better. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
