John, But you insist Pirsig isn't accounting for something in his explanation Now why is that? Ron
> On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:59 PM, John Carl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ron, > >> >>> I think there is an aspect of intellect, that is very close to DQ. >>> Intellect is indefinable and yeah, I know everything is, but intellect is >>> indefinable in a special way - since it's the means of defining as well. >>> So defining intellect, is most of all, more a creative art than a >>> rigorously logical process. >>> >>> That's all I'm sayin'. >> >> Ron; >> That's all Pirsig is saying. > Then we are in agreement and there shouldn't be a problem. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
