[Platt] According to some, the head and lead were not accurate. Thus, "the report was accurate" is a lie.
[Arlo] The report, and headline, were accurate. You made presumptions that were faulty, and jumped to conclusions before gathering the facts. [Platt] As for thinking skills, you have an ideology of "one right way to think." That's about as static as it comes. [Arlo] Yeah, how "elitist" of me to point out that making faulty assumptions and jumping to premature conclusions is "static". Nope, you go right on making presumptions and formulating faulty conclusions, its just as good as "my" way. wing conclusions based on ideological assumptions. [Platt] Next time you read every article in your local paper, let us know. A paper is designed to be perused, not studied like a text book. [Arlo] I don't read every article through. But if I'm going make some huge public proclamation (like discrediting the entire NHS based on a headline), chances are I'm going to at least open up some websites and look for supporting information. And then if I do make an error, and jump the gun to an erroneous position, I'm not going to blame "the headline". [Platt] Again, your arrogant "one right way to think" emerges. They don't call it the Ivory Tower for nothing. [Arlo] Yeah, again you're right. Gathering information before jumping to conclusions is so elitist. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
