Quoting Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > No, it's not a question of "being bothered." It's a question of truth and > accuracy in journalism. I was let to believe by Jos Laycock that the > Independent held a high reputation in Britain for professional journalism. > So when I read in the head and first paragraph that the NHS was responsible > for the problem, I quite rightly took it to be true. Now I am being told it > wasn't true, and it was my fault to believe that it was. Now I don't know > where you get your ideas for "critical thinking skills," but it seems that > truth is not high on the list. > > I've grown accustomed to these personal attacks from the holier than thou > crowd who inhabit academia. But I rest easy, especially in the knowledge of > the outrageous shameful behavior of some 80 odd academics in the Duke rape > case. > > [Case] > So Jos praises the publication for effectively communicating to the British > public and you are bent out of shape because it doesn't communicate to > someone who is not British. You might as well criticize Le Monde for > insisting on publishing in French. > > > > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >
------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
