Quoting Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Krimel] > As you well know discussing evolution with Platt is likely to make you want > to scream out "I wanna be sedated!"
Given a choice between Case's views of evolution and Pirsig's, I'll take Pirsig's any day, no matter how loud the screams: "'Survival of the fittest' is meaningful only when 'fittest' is equated with 'best,' which is to say, 'Quality.' And the Darwinians don't mean just any old quality, they mean undefined Quality! As Mayr's article makes clear, they are absolutely certain there is no way to define what that 'fittest' is. Good! The 'undefined fittest'they are defending is identical to Dynamic Quality. Natural selection is Dynamic Quality at work." (Lila, 11) ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
