Hi Akshay > Quality cannot fully be associated with memory, because you also > experience > something that is outside memory
DM: How would you describe this unre-cognised aspect of experience? (I suppose, rather naively, that Dynamic > Quality and static Quality point to the difference between novelty and > memory -- though certainly this would be valid only an intellectual level, > for inorganic static patterns have no concept of memory). DM: I see you have answered but if right then whereever there is SQ there is memory I'd suggest. How can you repeat unless you have some access to what is being repeated? > > 2. We value experiences differently (or rather, we value different > experiences) because our former experiences have molded us so. Now why > that > is the case, I know not, because that knowledge belongs to a system > outside > my mind's capacity of reach (similar to Hofstadter's explanation). Maybe > because there are patterns greater than us that decide what each part of > the > system is supposed to value (the Giant). DM: Do we not value may different aspects of our experience in different ways? moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
