[Krimel]
> Just to survive in a modern city requires a
> significantly higher level of
> consciousness than living in the woods. The woods
> demand acute senses and a
> calm mind as SA reminds us. The streets require
> constant scanning and
> instant response to small events that have the
> potential to kill you instantly.
the woods... it depends on where you live.
Danger can be around the next tree or bush, say, the
U.S. west, African savanna, India jungle, Siberian
winter, etc... I like the U.S. northeast for one
reason, it's safety - black bear, rare wolf in
Adirondacks coming across frozen lakes and rivers in
the north (according to Park Rangers), occasional
cougar, but really it would be the cold in the winter
that I'd delve into my wits to survive around here
more than anything. In the city, you do need to know
how to read, know what certain lights mean, or plainly
watch out for cars and dangerous people, and for what
the northeast has to offer in terms of animals
(including people), people are the most dangerous in
terms of who kills the most. I don't know for sure,
but I'd say per captia people kill more than the woods
in the northeast. The woods are a foundation of alert
and calm temperment and this basic way is interesting
when used in the city. Tom Brown Jr. bridged the
survival tracking technique of the Apache with the FBI
city need of tracking criminals. An interesting
merger of witty mindset can brighten a city with an
intelligence that assumes basic awareness of 'what's
happening here'.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
