Ron I meant ZMM of course. But if you fancy a change try Bishop Berkeley or Whitehead's Process & Reality for explanation of why the subject object language is optional and questionable.
DM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [MD] Perception,evolution and the spirit > > > Ron said: >> Subject/object perception can not be "dropped" like a unstylish hand >> bag. >> Anyone who thinks they do not percieve in terms of subjects and >> objects is fooling themselves. > > > I know a good book you should read. > > DM > > > [Ron] > Do tell, I could use a good read. Thanks! > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
