SA/Heather, Maybe DQ can be defined as whatever that's happening now, at this very moment, everything you're conscious of. And then SQ is the past, the remnants of then-DQ, and also the predicted future (because of our intellectual abilities). In a way, I see DQ as computation, SQ as information. Compsci is the Answer. :)
-- Akshay On 6/1/07, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Akshay] > > And so in a way I still agree with the MoQ's > division :p. But why is > > Dynamic Quality attributed to growth? It shouldn't > be. I thought DQ > is associated with the direct > experience I'm having at the moment > > as I type this, the real moment. > > > > Yes. This also goes along with what I partly > mentioned in the [MD] Soft Duality post. Dynamic > Quality is direct experience and primary reality, > thus, dq is empirical. Now try to define this direct > experience. Static quality is more difficult maybe, > or maybe instead of difficult, how about - open. The > levels can't be rigidly made distinct, yet. And this > 'yet' is an unending, thus, open 'yet'. And I've just > went around in a circle for dq is a question, an open > unending question, as in 'What is Quality?'. Answers > will be static, but the question remains dynamic. > > circles, > SA > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > TV dinner still cooling? > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
