[SA previously]
> > SOM science, but not a value oriented
science.
>
> Like I said, most science is SOM science that
> believes philosophically that
> there are no causes other than natural causes. No
> psychic phenomena allowed,
> not supernatural agencies, no prime mover, no God,
> and certainly no moral force.
I agree. I also am going to the root of the
problem, and resolving the issue with an MOQ science.
[Platt]
> You've put your finger on a gripe I've had with
education since the
> first grade -- very little integration of the
various subjects under an > overall umbrella of
principles. What does 19th century fiction have to >
do with geology? How does Shakespeare fit with Islam.
What is the
> relationship of anthropology to Western art?
Apparently such
> questions are in nobody's department.
Yes. All this specialization with no common
ground, dialogue, and place in which to study and pull
together all these various interests. Then when
school is over and everybody goes their separate ways,
again, not many people know what everybody else is
doing. The jobs are too specialized. It might be
easy to point out the wrongs of anothers job, but how
far removed have we been placed from each other's job
- starting with the education program. I agree.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
