[Micah]
> And here is where you are both alike - Platt and
Arlo, neither of you > are for freedom. Both lust for
power over others, the ultimate Social
> Quality. Arlo would like to force others in service
of an indefinable
> public/greater good. Freedom is the only greater
good. And Platt
> would like to force others to live by a "moral
code". Freedom is the
> only true moral code. But both lead to a form of
slavery, which no
> matter how justified, is slavery. The government
should not be in
> the marriage business... Freedom is free, unless
you are unwilling to > allow your neighbor's freedom.
> What are you two afraid of?
Unless, Micah, you are being very specific as to
freedom reining with marriages, which I would agree,
dislike, but my opinion doesn't have to reach the U.S.
government's micromanaging of events. As to freedom
stepping into an existing order, well yes here lies
the danger. The existing social order has an order, a
way, and throw freedom into that order, well, wouldn't
that be the same as 'you are free to do as you please
within the existing social order'? How would freedom
overcome any existing order? Freedom would conform to
any existing order, right? Freedom allows anything,
even existing orders. So, I don't see how freedom
changes anything. I do see how one order can clash or
change another existing order.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
