[Ian]
> When SA agrees and says ...
> "it is this connection with others, the social
> patterns, that
> determine how we, as a people, heavily influencing
> each other all the
> time unavoidably, it is us, living together, and how
> we value our time
> together, that's the social level in question."
I'm agreeing with you, Ian, and gav on the point
that we are unavoidably involved with other people.
Gav called this "no man is an island", and Ian, you
point out a similar point, right?
[Ian]
> Are you really saying this is the preferred social
> level arrangement,
> but you just don't want to call it "society" because
> that carries the
> baggage of the erstwhile giant ?
No. I don't know what preferred social level
arrangement your saying, I'm saying. I'm just saying
that the social level is in question due to the
unavoidance of people being involved with each other.
A monastery is a society, even if talking is not
allowed.
Now maybe you were asking gav these questions, or
maybe both of us, sooo, I took a stab at it.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
