[Ian]
> One large or many small communities, I can't see
literall "nil
> governance" ever working. I really think we're
talking about agreeing > the minimum necessary
lightest-touch governance... it beomes a
> definitional matter of the word "governance".
Yeah, I've posted enough today. I would like to
leave on a more dynamic intellectual note, so... I'm
glad you pin-down this 'governance', and brought that
back up. I agree. It does depend on what kind of
governance we mean. As the settlers moved west across
the Northern American continent, chiefs were picked
out by these settlers. They talked with those that
talked back. Treaties were signed by some that really
did not speak for the whole population. So, even if
we pick out what governance means, as you asked gav,
the strategies of the how's and what's, the voice of
the people, will depend not only on the people, but on
those in different populations toying with their own
agendas, as well.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
