-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Apparently the /banners/ is for people who want to advertise Mozilla
on their sites...

Regarding translations, it would be entirely possible to do a
/{page-name}.html.{language-code}, and this is transparently do-able
in Apache. This is good for a few reasons - its all in one place :-).

So for english we have:
http://www.mozilla.org/organisation/at_a_glance.html.en, for German
we could have
http://www.mozilla.org/organisation/at_a_glance.html.de, and when
refernecing the page you would just say
http://www.mozilla.org/organisation/at_a_glance.html. (then apache
would use the pref. lang which gets sent by the user-agent somewhere
in the HTTP request.)

(escuse my non-american spelling).

Or the other track would be to have a lump translation: eg
http://www.mozilla.org/en/organisation/at_a_glance.html.
http://www.mozilla.org/de/organisation/at_a_glance.html

Personally I don't like the second option...

I presume Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 could do something
similar.....................

Also, I reckon things like editorials, legal, press, roadmap-images,
etc would go nicely in a /organi{s/z}ation/ directory.
E.g. /organisation/editorials/, or /organisation/legal/, or
/organisation/press/, etc.

And for docs that don't fit anywhere, maybe a /misc/ :-), that way
one could really get rid of the /*.html's. (except for index.html).

My NZ 2 cents. (approx 5 cents american.)

- -Patrick.
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Axel Hecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.documentation
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: New Structure


> Several 2cnts below...
> 
> Gervase Markham wrote:
> > 
> > OK. Here's my first shot:
> > 
> > ( -> indicates a rename). "New directories" which already exist
> > will obviously still contain what's already in them. Obviously
> > each subdir will need a tidy-up inside it, but I'm not thinking
> > about that now :-)  
> > 
> > New top level dirs    Current top level dirs to move inside them
> > ------------------    ------------------------------------------
> > community   banners, events, party, school
> 
> banners? Is that stuff now under /images/? or something different?
> If those are just graphics for site use, the should IMHO stay in
> /images/  
> 
> > docs        build, classic, hacking, statistics
> 
> do we need separate dirs for user and developer docs?
> 
> > ports       unix
> > projects    bugs -> bugzilla, directory, editor, ef, mailnews,
> > msgsdk, 
> >             rhino
> 
> This could get rather crowded, which pages of a project should go
> beneath the projects dir, which should go to docs? Or is projects/
> more of the developer doc hierarchy?
> 
> > quality     bugs (rest of it)
> > releases    (stuff from seamonkey)
> > status
> > tech        rdf, scriptable -> xpconnect, wallet, xmlextras -> ?,
> > xpapps, 
> >             xpfe, js, newlayout -> gecko, oji, performance,
> >             profile-manager
> > ****        editorials, legal, press, roadmap-images, lots of the
> > docs 
> >             in the root dir
> > 
> > Really Important URLs we can't move:
> > MPL
> > credits
> > keymaster (?)
> > (Are there more of these?)
> > 
> > **** - I know these things should be grouped, but I can't think
> > of a good name for the directory they go in.
> 
> Where should we have L10N? Do we want translated introductions on
> mozilla.org?
> 
> <...>
> 
> Axel
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOjYnz+5gPjuO7VwfEQIU9QCeNckzET47iTFvVvDkn+2jXnheZnoAmQEK
WJbEAQLpOQIGKof82BNz8LXn
=Ah5v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to