In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TommyBee wrote:
> > > This is not Netscape 3.x
> > Wasn't saying that. Just saying that at the time it was (or at least
> > seemed) possible to have forms work without a web page composer.
>
> It still is. Like Asa said, Composer is really nothing more than the browser,
> but in reverse. Rather than the HTML coming in, being rendered, and presented
> to
> the user, the user creates the page, gives it to the renderer, and then may
> save
> it to disk. Composer is NOT an intergral part of the browser, the browser is
> integral to Composer.
Yeah, it wouldn't make much sense to have a Mozilla-based composer
without actually being able to see what the pages would look like in
Mozilla.
--
TommyBee
http://www.tommybee.com/
