Hall Stevenson wrote: <snip> > My point is: Go to a website that offers links to the various web > browsers. You'll have IE v5.x, Netscape 4.7x, NEtscape 6.1, Opera 5.x, > and mozilla 1.x. To the average user, the higher numbers are better. > mozilla 1.x will likely be the last one they even consider. "It's the > oldest one, right ??" That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex Communicator, HallZilla, etc. Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing and development purposes. It's fine with me if users go with Netscape 6.x instead of Mozilla because they consider 6.x to be newer and better than 1.0. A Netscape release gets the user agent out there just as well (maybe even better with commercial support and additional features like IM) as a Mozilla binary :) --Asa
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
